Sunday, December 4, 2005

Tropical Exterior Color House



For
Juan Fernando Perdomo *
GASOLINE: another complication! -
Everything became confused, he says Rafael.-fuel Consumers should not know how be. The gas station attendant, contrary to what we think, either.
The bank says it is not their fault but the government earns commissions and smiles of its "excellent idea" which is a complication for us, they are already controlled, "pay the duck" says Luis.
Les
ask the two: What are they talking about? - Do not know what to make fuel deductible expense you'll have to pay by credit card, debit card or check?, Rafael .- Something tells me I've heard. Why not me explain from the beginning to understand them? - Look, says Rafael, dated December 1, 2004 was published in the gazette of the federation the reform of Article 31 fraction. III para II of the law of income tax, which states that from 1 July 2005, to be deductible for tax on vehicle fuel consumption by sea, air and land, payment shall be made by check nominative taxpayer's credit card, debit card or electronic purse services and, even if this consumption does not exceed the amount of $ 2,000.00 .-
But that was, I say, what to pay with cards, checks and purses , right? "Look, before this reform will only be required to pay in this way when you buy a good or service is received and that the payment exceeds $ 2,000.00 but now, although the consumption of gasoline is at $ 50.00 have to pay in this way to be deductible for tax .-
But do not go into effect in July 2005, do you? - No, do not enter into force on that day as a resolution of miscellaneous amendments to the tax was extended by 1 September 2005 and this date also came and established as the starting date on 1 December this year, so that now they are This provision is in force .- And all need to do that? - Well, yes, if you want to deduct this expense, although this reform is an exception which is set in the fourth paragraph of the third section of the law of SRI that tax authorities may release from the obligation to pay the expenses in this way, when they are made in towns or rural areas without banking services. However, it is necessary noted that for the taxpayer to enjoy the facility requires approval of service tax administration, after solicitud. "Hey but this is still very complicated, I Tono says.
Toño owns a gas station and tells me they are very confused too .- Ah, but you stand to gain!, I say .- not believe it!, She answers immediately. To us we are being forced to get checks in addition to cards, and that's a huge risk .- Why, if you have insurance? The commission they charge you, I reviro. "Look, what happens if after refueling customer pays us with a check? How can I see you have funds? - Well, that yes! But before you can ask that will pay, nimbly comento. "So if you refuse to check the service .- No! But you can go to the bank check if you have funds .- The one o'clock? "Well.-imagine saying that you are paying by credit card and, after charge, no service on that board or me rejected. What, I stay with your car? - And think of the user who has multiple vehicles?, Armando tells me! A friend who is an individual with business with over 40 trucks on the country, is the credit bureau. They do not give credit card .- Orale! Well if you are complicated, right? "Besides, he asks, as I give my name card to 40 workers. Moreover, each station wants to charge commission to give the card payment service .- But we were not those of the idea!, Toño interrupted immediately. Do not tell me you want me to pay the fee charged by the Bank? "Well, not that they want, but consumers" pay the bill, "he reiterates Armando. On the other side of the coin is legal tender the instrument according to the currency law to conduct all transactions and is forced to contract credit cards or other financial instruments against his voluntad. "Well, that is, Luis and Rafael say that if they understand the issue, but also Prosecutor the process will be complicated because I must take the card and hope to make the electronic transaction, expected to get me the bill. And then you go with no bills!, Come back tomorrow. So I spent at the pump output Cordoba-Orizaba by federal. Hey Rafael, I ask, Is not this a violation of the law? In addition they are too complicated for those who do pay our taxes, because those who scurry credit card even interested in having. Moreover, they prefer not appear or deducir. "Yes, I said Rafael. This reform is in violation of Article 31 of the fourth fraction of the Federal Tax Code which states that obligations are Mexicans contribute to public expenditure in a proportional and equitable, and it is the case that the law of income tax in the last part of Section IX provides that, in the case of payments means that it is actually disbursed when the creditor's interest satisfied by any form of extinction of obligations as a way to extinguish an obligation is paid in cash .- Ucha, make me your phrases ball lawyer!, we inquiero .- Then do not play ball! , As politicians say, I almost said scolding. Article 29 of the federation's tax code provides for the payment means the act whereby the debtor meets under any title any obligation, so that both the law of income tax as the tax code provides that the payment we extinguish an obligation and does not require that this be by card or check so that this requirement is unfair and illegal and makes this inconstitucional. reform "Well, well. And the citizens what can we do? "Well, this can be challenged by an indirect amparo before a district court, asserting these inconsistencies. I suggest you seek advice before the camera you're an affiliate, call CANACO, CANACINTRA, CANACAR, CMIC.-or a tax lawyer, said Luis Rafael while smiles and says: "Besides, it has become clear that these findings bring as recurrence effect massive constitutional protection, which remains fairly made, are 100% coming, as it is clearly unconstitutional, that determination, so that if a large group of citizens is carried out in a year that determinación. withdraw "Well, let's do it, but we are left with this new complication in which only the Treasury and the banks win .* Juan Fernando Perdomo is a graduate of Tec de MONTERREY.Servidor public, businessmen and politicians ( jperdomo@infosel.net.mx

Thursday, September 8, 2005

Monster Energy Tounge Rings




ANALYTICAL POLICY
By Juan Fernando Perdomo *

I would have liked ...

I would have liked the President, since the beginning of his administration, submitted its report in writing, but not had spent so much money on bringing guests, make expensive invitations, spend thousands of police to divert traffic ...

Yes, I would have liked a stark report.

I wish you did not have two speeches. On the one hand that ended with the presidential ritual and, on the other, to make absolutely presidential event, with cheers and shouts of Members of his party, the older style, when not even say anything about what was done.

I would have liked a report of the president to let people know as we are, in general, and where we go.

I would have liked the president toured the country to say things are going, without having a "ball carriers" to your event, certainly more presidential than those of past presidents, and unless those members are hauled his team who aspire to become senators and deputies from the federal entity to which you are reporting.

I would have liked the president respected the people's representatives, deputies and senators, as it marks the constitution and not make them go to hear the report elsewhere in the country when, out of respect, should have done in Congress.

I would have liked the subjects who showed great achievements, become a reality before you go:
a. That all required insurance, they have it, as it says on TV. B.
That all schools that offered them electronic whiteboard before the end of the school year are, first, electric power, as reported in Veracruz. C.
The supply of 750.000 houses per year, would have turned to be more than twice of credits that he has given. D.
That democracy that advocates had driven before push Creel or outrageous to López Obrador. E.
We knew if there really is TWO AND A HALF MILLION OPPORTUNITIES Veracruzana, more than a million in HABITAT and more than Six hundred thousand children with scholarships, as he said in Veracruz.

I'd like to say that the Phoenix Project "is for the state of Veracruz" and not just "Go ahead!" Without saying "Who? When? and How?

I wish I knew Why applauded the governors of the PRI on tour? When all his speeches calling for "NO return to the PRI." As well as his speech of September said that there is respect Congress and yet also says that because of the lawmakers have not advanced.

I wish I knew, now, now, What makes up the structural reforms that he says have not been approved in Congress, though neither knows his cabinet? Had filed neither a proposal.

I wonder, why has blocked most reforms have been approved, by majority, of course, in the Senate and deputies, reforms supported by his own party and with the buzz of its own cabinet?

I would have liked to respect: "The executive proposes and the legislature has ..." Well, had problems: Sugarcane Act, the taxpayer's attorney, the budget of the federation, the tax treatment of PEMEX ...

There is so much I want to know about job insecurity, lack of medicines, poor roads, lack of school facilities decent ...!

I'm satisfied to know why FOX did not comply to Mexico?

* Juan Fernando Perdomo is a graduate of Tec de Monterrey.
public servant, businessman and politician (jperdomo@infosel.net.mx)

Watch Los Hombres De Paco Free Online

I would have liked ... GOOD NEWS ... YOU FEEL!



ANALYTICAL POLICY
By Juan Fernando
Perdomo * GOOD NEWS ... YOU FEEL! Leo

the newspaper headlines and see that there is good news. Not everything is black:


inflation for this year is 3.82%, experts say. This is great, because we are staying at levels similar to the first world economies.

domestic product (GDP) will grow to a level of 3.54%. Although correcting the INEGI to be around 3%.
Well, that's better than nothing and that the average bad that we have, but it will not for long. United States will grow at 3.58%. Will there be any difference between them and us? But almost as if we grow!

The dollar will not exceed by far the level of 11 pesos. Walk at 11.12 pesos per dollar. It has been maintained.

Interest rates in CETES to 28 days, will be the order of 9.33% at the end of 2005. This figure is very similar to last year.

Insured grow in 418.000. This shows that more jobs this year. In 2004 there were only 319.000 workers.

Foreign direct investment (FDI) will be approximately $ 14.363 million dollars.

The oil fund was increased to the middle of this year at $ 626 million pesos. Well, that reflects the high price of oil is paying off. Already has a fund of $ 12.234 million pesos.

The country's reserves exceeded U.S. $ 67.000 million.

Yep, news is also good news, though ... Do you feel?
Why ask?
Because, despite these encouraging figures, about a million Mexicans are still going to the United States each year. And this has increased in recent months.

spoken of almost 20.000 billion dollars in annual remittances sent in 2005 by our migrants.

It requires more than 400,000 jobs per year. Mentioned more than a million.
To achieve an economy that gives us quality of life and opportunities for all requires a growth of over 5% of GDP.

11 pesos to the dollar does not help us we can sell our products abroad as the trade deficit will be more than 9.000 million dollars.

field, "which is also our" was a sharp drop from 47% in temporary employment, with a deficit of 332.000 seats.

And "our oil" which has a large surplus of 220.000 million but generated only have 12,000 in stocks held for the future, it can not be used for anything else than for the case of lower prices ... but Other surpluses ... Where are they?

The questions, therefore, should be: a.
I have my job security. Furthermore, do I have stable jobs and well paid? B.
"I enjoy good health care in public hospitals I pay? Are there medicines that need my family? Does my insurance popular? C.
"Education is supported by the government and improved? D.
Do the roads have been upgraded my status? Are they better? E.
Do you care for my basic needs is a priority of government? F.
Am I lucky to have a government that cares about me? G
Did it improve my level of life? Is there security? Is there less corruption?
h. Have I benefited from the high price of "our oil"? I.
Social and productive programs of government it really benefit my business? Do I get a full-time and support? J.
"Low inflation is reflected in gas and electricity bills low? K
These "good news", it really is good news for me? For

perception of each may vary but, for my part, everyone keeps telling me that the situation is difficult. Some tell me it's the most difficult in years.

macroeconomics right. It does not depend only the autonomous decisions of our executive. International funds that support us put their conditions have to be respected, but also the price of oil has affected so that Mexico is not in the "planchette."

have to be honest, macroeconomics should be controlled, but that is only a part.

The other is that NO need to tell us we're good ... but it sits!

* Juan Fernando Perdomo is a graduate of Tec de Monterrey.
public servant, businessman and politician (jperdomo@infosel.net.mx)